Another Pauperising
Railway Budget
Union Railway Minister Pranav Kumar Bansal quoted Kautilya
to emphasise the importance of Artha
or money to any enterprise. It made one sit up in hope, expecting him to make
strong moves to restore the railway’s financial health.
But it was only so much flattery to deceive with other
couplets of poetry strewn about as well. Praise for Mr. Bansal’s tepid efforts
came only from partisan supporters such as Finance Minister Chidambaram and
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who made the surreal comment that it was
“reformist”.
In the end, Mr. Bansal made much of wiping out the Indian
Railway overall losses of Rs. 24,000 crores. But, his ambition is limited to
putting about Rs. 30,000 crores back into the till by 2014. The entire budget
speech smacked of unrealistic, unconvincing aspiration, long laundry-lists of
detail, but was abjectly timid in real
terms.
Mr. Bansal made announcements on many additional facilities,
factories and trains, carefully ignoring Opposition ruled states, and spoke improbably
of raising an unprecedented amount of Rs. 100,000 crores via the often
problematic PPP method.
He was also selling everyone short, or has set himself very
low standards, when he put a figure of a mere Rs. 94,000 crores towards the
requirement for development! The UPA II Government seems self- satisfied with
tinkering at change and ignores transformation altogether . It has taken the annual nature of the Railway
Budget much too literally, and is quite opaque on the need for continuity of progress.
The Indian Railways
are hardly fit for the 21st century, one needs to see any modern
railway system abroad for this point to be driven home. And with the recent
sharp deterioration in safety and security, and other standards, large tranches
of the better-off middle classes have
abandoned train travel altogether in favour of aeroplanes.
Yet the Government, its Railway Minister and senior Railway
Board officials, brazenly indulged in statistical jugglery to talk of declining
accident rates. If there are hundreds of obscure train routes, they do help to
dilute the statistics on routine accidents and deaths caused thereby on most,
if not all the busiest routes! To boldly emphasise this sophistry is to insult
the intelligence of ordinary people. Law and order on board trains, replete
with muggings, robberies, rapes and murder, is also increasingly common.
Ours may be a large, if not the largest, railway network in
the world, but it is highly antiquated and redolent of the colonial period. And
the modernist moves such as e-ticketing and wi-fi on select trains, while most
welcome, resemble the effort to keep the doughty Ambassador car going.
Adding Isuzu engines,
power brakes, better wiring and some limited electronics, do not still a modern
car make. The fact is, it is a chariot from the fifties and retrofitting it is
the first cousin to nostalgia. It makes little sense.
Similarly, the first Railway Minister from the Congress
Party after 17 years did not venture to increase passenger fares even as he
cited, multiple times, the costs of services were outstripping income at every
turn.
Raising freight rates is inflationary, but it has been
done. Raising passenger fares is not,
but it was not done, stating that they have been raised recently. But that was
a minimal increase, and one needs to do it almost as often as the change in
diesel, petrol and LPG. An attempt to align just petroleum price hikes has been
attempted on freight rates, but many other things need to be brought up- to-
date to cope.
Mr. Bansal has decided to raise marginally more revenue,
raising freight rates by 5% on average. This is not enough to even meet rising
costs, let alone modernise freight handling systems and processes. However,
rates for reservations on tatkal
basis, and on superfast trains, have thankfully been hiked. But because the
vast majority of rail travellers are not being made to pay more, neither can
the services be improved for them.
Sixty- seven new express trains have been added, but nothing
has been earmarked for the updating of infrastructure. New trains have been
announced, assuming that they actually see the light of day, they must perforce
run on the age-old rails. This, and ancient signalling equipment etc. is what compromises
safety along with free access to undesirable elements.
The sacking of Gopalganj station in Madhya Pradesh, minutes
after the Railway Minister finished his speech today, after two children were
killed in yet another railway accident, is a fitting cameo. Our stations are
only fit for period films set before WWII. The Great Indian Railway has lost
its romance as it struggles for survival in inadequate hands.
(771 words)
February 26th,
2013
Gautam Mukherjee
No comments:
Post a Comment