Fear over Faith
Mr. Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the US Federal Reserve Bank is
blamed for why the rupee is nose-diving and headed towards Rs. 65 to the US $.
With access to $ 80 billion in FII funding of our debt
markets including $30 billion of Government bonds, this is not good news.
Not good because the
FII hot money will leave, as they have shown us in May and June 2013, if the
arbitrage goes sour. The FIIs borrow cheap abroad and invest here in Indian
debt with a built in calculation for rupee devaluation. If we get worse than
what they have provided for, they pull the plug, and leave with their billions.
Bernanke, to be fair to the man, merely said he would like
to start tightening monetary policy if signs of growth in the US turned
consistently stable, perhaps after September 2013.
This was interpreted to mean that the US would start
tapering off its buying of $85 billion in bonds every month under its “quantitative easing” or stimulus to the economy programme, almost right away.
And it caused a lot of money overseas in all the emerging
markets (EMs), to rush back to the US, just in case, before this happened.
Maybe that is precisely what the professorial Mr. Bernanke intended but we
can’t prove it.
At the same time, almost every US analyst is confident that
Mr. Bernanke will not take any fiscal measures, in his couple of months in the
hot seat remaining, that could hurt the recovery and growth that is emerging. After
all, Mr. Bernanke wants his policy to be seen to have worked first.
So far, US Housing and Real
Estate prices have begun to rise quite robustly; unemployment figures show an
uptick most of the time, bankruptcies, the City of Detroit and its pension
funding notwithstanding, are not very common now.
But we are in August 2013, and the US has certainly not
stabilised on its growth path enough to call for a rising of interest rates. Though the latest is the trade deficit figures are a little better.
A tapering off therefore has to come some day; but it does not seem to
be anywhere near that day as yet.
The US however, is not suffering from inflation as India is, probably because of the high liquidity courtesy the Fed. The practically zero cost of finance, mandated in the face of fraction of a percentage point growth quarter on quarter.
And because the US imports petroleum only to conserve its
own substantial reserves and does not price it particularly high for the
consumer.
Bernanke, due to retire from his Fed post shortly, talked
about possibly tightening monetary policy in the last quarter of the year. He
said this on the 23rd of May 2013, and ended up impacting all emerging market
currencies, including India’s.
FII money left the party abruptly after this, putting
pressure on the rupee, and when more and more left every day; it certainly made
matters very much worse.
The Indian rupee fell in line with the EMs at between 5 and
10%, maybe a bit harder than the rest. After all, even the service sector of
the domestic economy is in the doldrums, read IT, despite the weak rupee. This
is due to long term policy paralysis, the economy shrinking rapidly because of
our very tight liquidity position, high interest rates, and runaway inflation.
The Indian
Government, unlike the US one, has come up with or done absolutely nothing
effective to help matters.
The contrast between the US approach, wherein the Federal
Reserve has kept interest rates as low as 0.25% or less, since 2008, and the
anti-growth policies of the Reserve Bank of India, could not be more stark.
Now it will be the turn of Mr. Rajan from early
September 2013, when he replaces D. Subbarao, and so let us see.
But even when the Indian economy was booming in 2007, the
RBI began to apprehend various bubbles and tightened monetary policy lest we
grow too much too fast. And when the
Western economies collapsed in 2008, it saw virtue in clamping down even
more strongly on what must have seemed to be “irrational exuberance”
masquerading as growth.
India has raised interest rates over a dozen times since
2008, and tightened likewise the
interbank rates, raised the cash
reserves ratios of the banks, and asked for stringent provisioning for bad
debts.
All this, with a view to contain inflation, which has
permeated the economy regardless; mainly because of our 70% dependence on
imported petroleum, prices of which we have no control over.
We do have some preferential pricing in procurement from
some of our long term suppliers, but then India taxes the retail product
heavily at the Central and State levels too, even as it subsidises the price at
the pump. That is why we have some of the most expensive petrol, diesel, and
aviation fuel in the world.
We are now taking off the petroleum subsidies, and thereby
spiking retail prices of everything, but notice that the taxes stay more or
less intact.
Goa took off the VAT,
slashing prices by Rs. 11 per litre and offering the cheapest petrol and diesel
in the country since 2012.
But meanwhile, to compound matters, the RBI has been keen to
dampen high asset prices, seeing it as inflationary . It has discouraged
lending to builders, and the real estate sector, and practically forced
business and industry to seek opportunities, acquisitions and financing abroad
on the similar perception of arbitrage opportunities elsewhere.
But at the end of the day, all measures taken by the
Government have not worked. Instead, a thriving 8% plus GDP growth per annum
economy has been cruelly slowed; with its GDP halved.
The irony is that there has been no attempt to course-
correct or reverse this anti-growth policy
despite its lack of traction or success. Inflation, particularly food inflation,
clearly is a great worry but the Government has not been able to control food
prices at all.
There is a demand
supply mismatch compounded by high transportation costs. The remedy of giving
away subsidised food in various welfare schemes has also proved to be
ineffective.
There is an acute need to change policies towards
encouraging both the private sector in business and industry and agriculture
too.
The Economist says we must resurrect our enthusiasm for Reform. The
Government has to see itself in less regulatory, extortionate, and profligate
terms; and become a friend to entrepreneurship instead.
Mr. Narendra Modi wants to take the politics and economics
of this country forward and should be
given a chance to do so.
(1,096 words)
August 6th,
2013
Gautam Mukherjee
No comments:
Post a Comment