Land &
Development
When it comes to Real Estate in India, the money bags
instantly start to jingle. All of it appreciates in value via a one way
trajectory. The very good, like the 3500 odd sq.ft. Duplex flat in Samudra
Mahal building in South Mumbai, bought very recently by specialised glassware maker
Borosil for Rs. 43 crores, shows you just how good it can get. Scarcity, maintenance, location, amenities,
all put together, breed bumper profits.
And any old hovel or piece of land also appreciates, anywhere
in this country, even in troubled Kashmir or the bad lands of Bastar. Land and
buildings simply never lose value here. The market may slow from time to time
cyclically, even go into hibernation, but prices never retreat. There may be a
distress sale every now and then but it has no effect on the overall rates. If
an old, unsafe building falls down in the rains, it provides an opportunity to
build a new one in its place and make money all around.
The Realty Bill, or The Real Estate Regulatory Bill, recently
passed by the Union Cabinet for enactment into law, will be tabled soon. It
seeks to regulate builders to protect the interests of the investors. Builders
will be required to place the proceeds of investor payments in an escrow
account to the extent of 70%, and use the money only for the building they have
received the money to build.
They are not going to be allowed to sell space to speculators, cartels of brokers and “investors” etc. before all permissions are secured. They might however be able to access bank funds more easily after all these niceties are observed. There are a host of other provisions intended to provide greater transparency and accountability. There is also a redressal mechanism by way of an appellate and a dedicated tribunal. The ideas, in short, are impressively utopian, but surely there are loop holes?
They are not going to be allowed to sell space to speculators, cartels of brokers and “investors” etc. before all permissions are secured. They might however be able to access bank funds more easily after all these niceties are observed. There are a host of other provisions intended to provide greater transparency and accountability. There is also a redressal mechanism by way of an appellate and a dedicated tribunal. The ideas, in short, are impressively utopian, but surely there are loop holes?
Yes there are. The biggest one is to do with the threshold
itself. The proposed minimum plot size of 4,000 square metres to be covered
under the legislation leaves out all the smaller developments. It also tempts
developers to apply for sanctions of areas less than the threshold that would
bring it under the ambit of the new law being proposed.
Besides, many redevelopment projects and stand- alone developments are easily below this 40,880 sq. ft. minimum. A developer could be tempted to apply for segments below 4,000 sq.m. under different names and configurations to dodge this law.
Besides, many redevelopment projects and stand- alone developments are easily below this 40,880 sq. ft. minimum. A developer could be tempted to apply for segments below 4,000 sq.m. under different names and configurations to dodge this law.
After all, the builders can’t be thrilled with this. They
have been putting in the seed capital and then working with free funding from
the buyers. Now they can maybe access bank funds for which they have to provide
collateral and pay interest. Their affairs will be watched. Their books and
cash flows will be scrutinised. How can they turn an anything- goes business
into a nice neat one? But the Government intends to try.
But, says the investor fraternity who gain from the builders
and their “soft launches”, the media watch-dogs who run TV programmes on real
estate and sell print supplements full of advertisements, the experts who opine
and write, all this is going to put up the prices.
Those who own property already are not displeased at all.
More regulation is good they think and good we bought when it was cheaper and
not regulated so much. The aspirant and the arriveste
however will have to fork out more.
Regulation will restrict. Ergo, corruption will prosper. And
even if it doesn’t, prices will be enhanced for all this, along with FAR
commitments, building bye-laws, material cost escalations, inflation and taxes
doing their bit too.
But says Mr. Ajay Maken, the Minister I/C, it will check
fraud and those builders who don’t build what they promise at all, and merely
abscond with the swag, and/or declare bankruptcy after having abstracted it.
It will stop builders from using collections to start multiple projects and delay the completion of them all. It will compel them to finance their projects more substantially thus giving them the incentive to complete them on time.
It will make them own up on the actual floor area of flats and confess all the hidden charges.
Overall, the consumer will be protected maybe, but at a price. But first such a bill has to run the gauntlet of massive vested interest in order to turn into law.
(738 words)
June 7th,
2013
Gautam Mukherjee
No comments:
Post a Comment